Oklahoma Farm Report masthead graphic with wheat on the left and cattle on the right.
Howdy Neighbors!
Ron Hays, Director of Farm and Ranch Programming, Radio Oklahoma Ag Network  |  2401 Exchange Ave, Suite F, Oklahoma City, Ok 73108  |  (405) 601-9211


Agricultural News

Farm to Fork and the Agricultural Innovation Agenda

Fri, 19 Feb 2021 10:32:15 CST

Farm to Fork and the Agricultural Innovation Agenda In the latest USwheat.org Newsletter Ben Conner, Partner, DTB Associates, LLP writes about the Ag Innovation Agenda.

The year 2020 will be known for many things, but one overlooked development that could have far-reaching consequences for global food security and sustainability was the juxtaposition of the European Commission’s Farm to Fork (F2F) strategy and the USDA’s Agriculture Innovation Agenda (AIA) at the beginning of that year.

Both plans aim to reduce agriculture’s environmental footprint, but the approaches diverge dramatically. Some key goals of the F2F strategy are:

Reduce the use of pesticides by 50%;
Reduce fertilizer use by 20%;
Reduce sales of antimicrobials in agriculture by 50%;
Expand organic farming to 25% of total farmland;
Mandatory labeling covering nutrition, climate, environmental, and social aspects of food;
Global transition towards sustainable food systems.
These are not necessarily bad goals; one would be hard-pressed to find a U.S. farmer who enjoys having to buy and apply inputs. But without game-changing innovations, the ripple effects could be catastrophic.

A USDA report projects that F2F implementation would lead to a 12% and 16% drop in EU production and farm income, respectively, if the EU alone meets these goals. In contrast, the United States would see exports increase and farm income rise. EU policymakers clearly understand that F2F regulations could damage its farm sector if farmers in more competitive jurisdictions are not subject to the same standards for exports into the single market.

The Commission explicitly seeks a global transition towards what it calls sustainable agri-food systems while promising to use the tools in its trade policy arsenal to make that happen. If these ambitions are realized on a global scale, the USDA report estimates that F2F would reduce global production by 11%, raise food prices by nearly 90%, cost over US$1 trillion in global GDP, and 185 million more people would be food insecure.

Implementation will be critical to watch. World Trade Organization (WTO) rules relating to technical barriers to trade, sanitary and phytosanitary measures, and conservation of natural resources could be applicable and should limit the EU’s scope for action on imports. However, the EU has a long track record of ignoring WTO commitments (though it is not alone), often culminating in trade disputes. If the EU’s trading partners do not work to ensure that F2F measures comply with WTO rules, farmers and companies in other countries could see these measures become de facto global standards.

A Different Approach

USDA has taken a different approach through the AIA by prioritizing farmers’ needs – i.e., the ones simultaneously working with and fighting nature to produce food – while embracing technological innovation as a key component of reducing agriculture’s environmental footprint. The Commission claims that innovation will be a part of the F2F strategy and promises an investment of €10 billion for research, but its approach appears to be driven by high-level input reduction targets rather than environmental outcomes, food security, and farmer profitability.

The AIA prioritizes both public and private sector research, embraces new technologies, and envisions metrics and scorecards for productivity and conservation outcomes. It does not aspire to regulate everything in agriculture “from farm to fork,” but it does seek to harness technology and ingenuity to reduce agriculture’s environmental footprint. These visions do not have to conflict; sustainable intensification can coexist alongside agroecological models and inform each other. Unfortunately, Brussels seems to have included innovation in F2F as an afterthought while it seeks to impose unrealistic and even harmful standards on farmers who rely on access to its market.



WebReadyTM Powered by WireReady® NSI


Top Agricultural News

  • Monday, March 1, 2021 Market Wrap-Up with Justin Lewis  Mon, 01 Mar 2021 15:53:42 CST
  • Oklahoma Grain Elevator Cash Bids as of 2:00 p.m, Monday, March 1 2021  Mon, 01 Mar 2021 15:02:38 CST
  • 12 House Ways & Means Members Call on Treasury to Withdraw Section 199A Rules for Farmer Co-ops  Mon, 01 Mar 2021 12:35:17 CST
  • Optimism in Beef Industry Fueled by Strong Demand with Higher Prices Anticipated  Mon, 01 Mar 2021 11:46:22 CST
  • Dr. Derrell Peel on the U.S. Beef Export Situation and Update   Mon, 01 Mar 2021 11:39:16 CST
  • Governor Still Appoints Shelley Paulk to OK Tax Commission   Mon, 01 Mar 2021 11:31:54 CST
  • The Victor Ranch Receives Oklahoma Leopold Conservation Award  Mon, 01 Mar 2021 09:24:30 CST
  • USDA Announces Dr. Dewayne Goldmon as Senior Advisor, Racial Equity, and Andy Green as Senior Advisor, Fair and Competitive Markets  Mon, 01 Mar 2021 09:20:56 CST

  • More Headlines...


    Ron salutes our daily email sponsors!

    Oklahoma Ag Credit Oklahoma Farm Bureau National Livestock Credit Ag Mediation Program P&K Equipment Tulsa Farm Show AFR Insurance Stillwater Milling Oklahoma Cattlemen's Association KIS FUTURES, INC.

    Our Road to Rural Prosperity sponsors!


    Search OklahomaFarmReport.com

    © 2008-2021 Oklahoma Farm Report
    Email Ron   |   Newsletter Signup   |    Current Spots   |    Program Links

    WebReady powered by WireReady® Inc.